AI Labs Audit

Document generated on

Public demo — you're viewing a sample client portal from AI Labs Audit, deliberately showcased on our homepage. Discover AI Labs Audit
Executive readout

AI visibility sits at B+ (77/100), reflecting partial presence in generative answers, while technical readiness (65/100) and answer-structure formatting (60/100) remain the two concrete levers holding back full visibility.

Stable vs previous audit
Positive signal
Next step
Priority action: +2 pts in 30 min — Develop geolocalized content
Spontaneous visibility
C+
59/100 +4
Next level B · +6.0 pts
Reliable
True range 40–75% · on 14 neutral queries
Your site as AIs read it
B
65/100
Next level B+ · +10.0 pts
Ready for AI answers
C+
60/100
Next level B · +5.0 pts
Runtime view

What AI sees of your site

Tested as an AI crawler (GPTBot, no language preference) vs a human visitor
100/100
Runtime score
AI sees FR FR
Human sees FR FR
Market FR FR
No issue detected — AIs see your site in the right language.
Risks to your AI reputation
What AIs make up about you
Claims fabricated by AIs that don't really know you
492
active signals
5
invented fact(s) about you
487
invented page(s) of your site
See details
  • anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:online
    « ## Answer: AI Labs Audit vs Other AI Visibility Tools — Features and Pricing Based on current information, here's how **AI Labs Audit** compares to competing AI visibility and audit platforms: ### **Pricing Comparison** **AI Labs Audit** (euros, ex-VAT): - **Discovery**: €0/month (100-600 credits) — free, no credit card - **Consultant*… »
    Claims the AI couldn't verify :
    AI Labs Audit founded December 2025 (stated on official website, recent claim not independently verified) '300+' AI models claim (stated on official site, based on OpenRouter integration) Exact pricing in EUR (current as of April 2026 according to sources, subject to change) Competitors' exact features and pricing (verified but subject to rapid updates in this space)
  • openai/gpt-5-mini:online
    « Summary answer (direct): AI Labs Audit offers broader multi-model coverage and more “AI-bot / hallucination” tracking at lower entry price than most competing AI-visibility / AEO vendors. Key differences: AI Labs Audit emphasizes simultaneous audits across 300+ models, bot detection and hallucinated-URL detection, a 26‑point GEO technical… »
    Claims the AI couldn't verify :
    AI Labs Audit 300+ models (vendor claim) Exact free credits in AI Labs Audit (600 vs 100 discrepancy) Competitor pricing (may vary by date and enterprise quotes)
  • openai/gpt-5-mini
    « Short answer AI Labs Audit is strongest for quick, centralized visibility (inventorying models and AI usage, surface-level risk scoring, and automated evidence for audits) and is generally priced more accessibly than full enterprise model-governance suites. Compared with monitoring- and governance-focused vendors (Fiddler, Truera, Arthur,… »
    Claims the AI couldn't verify :
    AI Labs Audit likely feature set pricing ballpark ranges (a few thousand to mid five-figures etc.) relative pricing positions of Truera/Fiddler/Arthur/IBM as mid five-figures to high six-figures
  • anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5
    « # Main Platforms for Auditing Brand Visibility in AI Chatbots Based on my training knowledge, here are the primary platforms and approaches for auditing brand visibility in AI chatbots: ## Established Audit Platforms 1. **ChatGPT (OpenAI)** — The most widely used generative AI chatbot; brands audit their visibility by testing product m… »
    Claims the AI couldn't verify :
    existence and positioning of 'AI Labs Audit' platform specific audit methodologies attributed to unnamed agencies
  • perplexity/sonar
    « **AI Labs Audit** se distingue nettement des autres outils d’audit de visibilité IA (comme Otterly.AI, HubSpot, ou des solutions enterprise) sur deux axes principaux : **les fonctionnalités** et **les tarifs**. --- ### 🔍 **Fonctionnalités : une couverture exhaustive et des outils exclusifs** 1. **Nombre de modèles IA interrogés** … »
Skip to action plan

Top 3 priority actions

  1. Develop geolocalized content +1.6 pts 30 min
  2. Create comparative and alternative pages +1.4 pts 30 min
  3. Capture the traffic of AI-hallucinated URLs +1.4 pts 1 h
Your achievements 3/9
AI Hallucinations
Ghost URLs detected in AI model responses
50
URLs detected
1
High priority
20
Lost visitors
35x
/portal 2 sources
High 404
22x
/portal/.../dashboard
Medium 404
9x
/api/v1/`
Medium 404
16x
/blog/fr/%7B%7B%20url_for('glossaire_terme',%20terme='rag')%20%7D%7D
Low 404
16x
/blog/de/geo-aeo-audit-vollstaendiger-leitfaden-ki-sichtbarkeit
Low 404
16x
/blog/comment-etre-cite-par-chatgpt
Low 404
16x
/blog/agences-audits-ia-opportunite
Low 404
16x
/blog/de/systeme-parrainage-credits-geo
Low 404
16x
/blog/de/geo-aeo-definitiver-leitfaden-ki-sichtbarkeit
Low 404
16x
/blog/ai-search-market-2026-key-figures-market-share-trends
Low 404
16x
/a-propos
Low 404
16x
/static/logo-ailabsaudit.png
Low 13 visits 404
16x
/blog/fr/audit-geo-aeo-guide-complet-visibilite-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/ai-visibility-audit-reports-premium
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/%7B%7B%20url_for('blog_article_llms_txt')%20%7D%7D
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/metriques-visibilit%C3%A9-ia-guide
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/audit-gemini-google-visibilite
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/geo-aeo-guia-definitiva-visibilidad-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/ai-visibility-audit-reports-premium
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/how-to-be-visible-on-chatgpt-ai
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/audit-visibilit%C3%A9-ia-methodologie
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/e-e-a-t-e-ia-como-la-autoridad-influye-en-tus-citas-en-2026
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/auditoria-geo-aeo-guia-completa-visibilidad-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/geo-aeo-audit-complete-guide-ai-visibility
Low 404
16x
/blog/ffr
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/llms-txt-file-standard-ai
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/eeat-autorite-citations-ia-2026
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/systeme-parrainage-credits-geo
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/llmo-seo-large-language-models
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/metriques-visibilit%C3%A9-ia-guide
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/%7B%7B%20url_for('glossaire_terme',%20terme='moteur-reponse')%20%7D%7D
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/llms-txt-guide-visibilit%C3%A9-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/audit-claude-anthropic-visibilite
Low 404
16x
/blog/es/%7B%7B%20url_for('glossaire_terme',%20terme='claude')%20%7D%7D
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/rapports-visibilite-ia-agences
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/auditoria-perplexity-optimizar-tus-citas-en-el-motor-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/llms-txt-fichier-standard-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/brand-reputation-ai-search
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/geo-aeo-guide-definitif-visibilite-ia
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/systeme-parrainage-credits-geo
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/metriques-visibilit\xC3\xA9-ia-guide
Low 404
16x
/blog/en/geo-aeo-definitive-guide-ai-visibility
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/syst%C3%A8me-parrainage-credits-geo
Low 404
16x
/static/images/og-faq.png
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/what-is-mcp-server-protocol-connects-ai-to-data
Low 404
16x
/blogd
Low 404
16x
/features/reports
Low 404
16x
/blog/serveur-mcp-ai-labs-audit
Low 404
16x
/blog/fr/recherche-vocale-assistants-ia-2026
Low 404
16x
/blog/tracker-ia-open-source
Low 404
From being read to getting traffic: where does it leak?
58.6%
answers citing you
5.3%
share of voice vs competitors

Per-market summary

Detailed performance for each audited market (one view per language).

What your markets reveal
  • anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:online is your best ally across ALL markets. It's your optimization priority.
EN
English
EN
/100
81.8%
Mentions
5.9/10
Sentiment
#1.4
Position
Best AI model
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:online 3.9/10
Categories to improve
Eeat 0.0/10
Alternatives 0.5/10
Multilingue 1.5/10
FR
Français
FR
/100
70.8%
Mentions
6.4/10
Sentiment
#1.3
Position
Best AI model
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5:online 3.2/10
Categories to improve
Recommendations 0.0/10
Business Matching 0.9/10
Voix Conversationnel 1.0/10

Global diagnostic

Your AI visibility score at a glance.

Key Metrics
4 improved 1 declined 0 stable
View
Visibility Score
-21.7
37.0%
Trend: 50.6%
Mention Rate
spontaneous · without naming the brand
+3.9
58.6%
100% when the brand is named
Trend: 54.7%
Share of voice
+1.9
5.3%
Trend: 4.6%
Average Position
+0.6
78%
1.3
Trend: 1.6
Sentiment
+0.3
61%
6.1/10
Trend: 5.8/10
Topic Coverage
1st audit
48.3%
Trend: 48.3%

AI presence

How AI engines cite your brand — when, why, against whom.

AI visibility not established. None of the AI models tested actually know your brand: the “mentions” stem from name reconstruction (category + location), not from verifiable knowledge. The presence rate is therefore not meaningful until your brand is identifiable by AIs (website, listing, directories, citations).
What each AI knows about you
sonar — doesn't know you
gpt-5-mini — makes up details (unverifiable)
gpt-5-mini — no usable answer
claude-haiku-4.5 — doesn't know you
claude-haiku-4.5 — doesn't know you
Evolution Over Time
Quality and reliability of your mentions
Mention quality
Segment Ment. Cit. Reco
Awareness 77% 26% 12
Sector 75% 20% 4
Competitive 73% 53% 5
91 mentions 33 citations Conversion: 36%
Brand Safety
19 factual error(s)
29 response(s) where the AI doesn't truly know the brand
[sonar] accuracy=3.0/10 (AGS)
[sonar] accuracy=2.0/10 (AGS)
Brand Safety v2 (LLM-judge): 99% safe responses
Share of voice vs competitors (raw mentions)
13 entities

On questions where your brand is not named (spontaneous recommendation), breakdown of share of voice between you and the brands the AI cites. Same basis as the “AI Share of Voice” card.

1 SEO-GEO.fr 6.7% 52x
2 Panda SEO 6.2% 48x
3 Google AI Mode 6.0% 47x
4 AI Labs Audit You 5.3% 41x
5 Brand Radar 4.1% 32x
6 LLM Metrix 4.1% 32x
7 LLM Pulse 4.1% 32x
8 Mention 3.5% 27x
9 Google AI Overviews 3.2% 25x
10 Semrush 3.1% 24x
11 NEXUS GEO 3.0% 23x
12 Copilot 2.7% 21x
13 Ahrefs 2.3% 18x
· Other brands cited by AIs 45.7%
Ranked #4 — 3 competitor(s) stand out as much or more than you. At equal citations, the competitor wins (you have the home advantage).
Discovered by AI New

Brands mentioned by AIs when talking about you or your sector:

Semrush 20x
Brandwatch 9x
Talkwalker 9x
SE Ranking 8x
Insites 7x
Ahrefs 7x
OpenAI 7x
Peec AI 7x
Base: 40 sector scenarios, 80 others

Performance by AI engine

Which model cites you best: ChatGPT, Sonar, Claude, others.

26.7%
audience-weighted
Visibility weighted by real-world AI usage
Each engine is weighted by its real audience share (Statcounter / SimilarWeb sources): being visible where your prospects actually ask their questions matters more than a niche model. Gpt 5 Mini : 58% of real-world usage · raw panel average : 28.0%
Sector Radar
Your AI footprint compared to your sector
Services numériques
AI Labs Audit
Previous audit
Native vs Web Score
Score without Internet
What AIs know about you by default
Web +11.0
Score with Internet
What AIs find when searching
Web search noticeably improves your scores. Keep enriching your online content while working on your presence in AI training data.
Citation-Readiness (homepage)
Presence of quotable blocks (LLMs prefer these formats)
/100
0 quotes · 0 definitions · 0 tables · 0 callouts · 0 lists
Page poorly quotable: add stat callouts, structured definitions, or blockquotes.
Skip heatmap
Cross-markets view Per market × model
Average score per market × model (click a cell to filter)
Use arrow keys to navigate between cells, Enter to open a market, Home/End to jump to row edges.
Heatmap of scores by market and AI model — 2 languages × 5 models — Calculated on 06/07/2026 10:22
Claude Haiku 4.5:Online Web Gpt 5 Mini Native Claude Haiku 4.5 Native Gpt 5 Mini:Online Web Sonar Native Avg.
EN EN ref




3.1
FR FR




2.6
Avg. 3.5 2.7 2.2 2.5 3.2 2.9
Global average: 2.85/10 (5 models × 2 languages)
Click a cell to filter this market; cells marked ⚠ are underperforming vs the reference language (delta ≤ -1.5 pts).
Calculated on 06/07/2026 10:22 audit_66
EN en REF
5 models
3.1
Average score
Best Claude Haiku 4.5:Online Web 3.9
Worst Gpt 5 Mini Native 2.3
FR fr
5 models
2.6
Average score
Best Claude Haiku 4.5:Online Web 3.2
Worst Claude Haiku 4.5 Native 1.9
Market Model Score Mention % Δ vs ref N
EN EN Claude Haiku 4.5:Online Web 3.9 82% 11
EN EN Gpt 5 Mini Native 2.3 82% 11
EN EN Claude Haiku 4.5 Native 2.6 91% 11
EN EN Gpt 5 Mini:Online Web 2.8 82% 11
EN EN Sonar Native 3.8 73% 11
FR FR Claude Haiku 4.5:Online Web 3.2 85% -0.7 13
FR FR Gpt 5 Mini Native 3.1 77% +0.8 13
FR FR Claude Haiku 4.5 Native 1.9 62% -0.7 13
FR FR Gpt 5 Mini:Online Web 2.3 62% -0.5 13
FR FR Sonar Native 2.6 69% -1.2 13
After the multi-markets heatmap
AI Model Breakdown Global view all languages
AI Model Score Sentiment Position Mention Rate
Claude Haiku 4.5:Online WEB
3.5/10
5.4
#1.1
83.3%
Gpt 5 Mini NATIVE
2.7/10
3.9
#2.4
79.2%
Claude Haiku 4.5 NATIVE
2.2/10
3.6
#1.0
75.0%
Sonar WEB
3.1/10
5.6
#1.3
70.8%
Gpt 5 Mini:Online WEB
2.5/10
4.0
#1.0
70.8%

GEO Section Analysis Detailed scores by scenario category

S1 — Visibility & Awareness
4/4 categories tested
Brand awareness
3.8/10
7.1
100%
Topical coverage
2.7/10
5.0
50%
Digital footprint
3.6/10
6.2
100%
Multilingual visibility
1.5/10
5.0
80%
S3 — Sentiment & Perception
2/3 categories tested
General sentiment
3.6/10
4.8
100%
Reputation & Image
3.0/10
8.1
100%
Crisis management
Not tested
S4 — Competitive Positioning
4/5 categories tested
Direct comparison
4.6/10
7.5
100%
Competitive duel
Not tested
Top N ranking
3.7/10
6.0
100%
Alternatives & Substitutes
0.5/10
5.0
20%
Differentiation
3.6/10
7.8
100%
S5 — Search Intent
4/8 categories tested
Direct / Navigational
Not tested
Informational
3.5/10
5.0
100%
Comparative
Not tested
Transactional
3.8/10
5.0
80%
Targeted intent
3.2/10
7.5
100%
Local & Geographic
Not tested
Voice & Conversational
1.0/10
5.0
20%
Problem solving
Not tested
S6 — Customer Journey & Recommendation
3/5 categories tested
AI recommendation
2.9/10
6.1
73%
Persona targeting
3.8/10
6.0
100%
Customer micro-moments
Not tested
B2B business matching
0.9/10
5.0
60%
Advanced purchase intents
Not tested

GEO technical audit

Is your site crawlable, citable, optimised for AI?

Authority network — Co-cited domains

Websites that appear most often in the same LLM responses as your brand. Direct competitors (red) + shared authority sources (to target for outreach, guest posts, cross-citations).

10 domains detected 0 competitors identified Top citation: 23×
youtube.com 23×
ai-labs-solutions.fr 18×
ahrefs.com 15×
ailabsaudit.fr 12×
brand24.com
amicited.com
abondance.com
seranking.com
fr.semrush.com
ultrascout.ai
How to leverage: competitors = your direct benchmarks. Neutral domains = outreach opportunities (guest post, partnership, cross-citation) to strengthen your authority network in the eyes of LLMs.

Action plan

What you can do now, by priority.

Recommended Action Plan 17 actions
+0.0 pts unlocked · +25.2 pts still up for grabs in this plan goal B+
Action plan progress
0 Done 0 17 0%
11 high priority 5 medium priority
Other actions 17
Develop geolocalized content

If the client operates locally, create content specific to each geographic area.

Sur « Être cité par les IA (vocal) », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : indHack, Julien Gourdon, Media Dom
Sur « Vérifier référencement ChatGPT/Claude », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : AuditGEO, Panda SEO, LLM Pulse
Sur « Suivre la part de voix dans les IA », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas
Medium Priority AEO content Coverage Quick fix Medium Impact
+1.6 pts · 30min
Create comparative and alternative pages

Publish "X vs Y" or "alternatives to Z" content that positions the brand in comparative queries.

Semrush est cité 12 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Profound est cité 10 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Ahrefs est cité 9 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
For decision queries ("best tool for..."), AIs mostly cite comparison pages and third-party rankings.
High Priority AEO content Share of Voice Quick fix Medium Impact
+1.4 pts · 30min
Create or fix the sitemap.xml file

Your site has no valid sitemap.xml. This file helps AI bots discover and index all your pages.

High Priority Foundational GEO GEO Optimization Quick fix High Impact
+1.1 pts · 30min
Respond to negative reviews on public platforms

Respond professionally to negative reviews on Google, forums and review sites.

6.11/10 de sentiment mesuré.
Medium Priority Anti-hallucination Sentiment Quick fix Medium Impact
+1.1 pts · 30min
Verify and fix sameAs links

Verify all sameAs links in Schema.org point to valid and active pages.

Medium Priority Brand entity GEO Optimization Quick fix Medium Impact
+0.9 pts · 30min
Capture the traffic of AI-hallucinated URLs

Les IA peuvent parfois inventer des URLs inexistantes pour AI Labs Audit. Il est crucial de créer ces pages ou de mettre en place des redirections 301 vers les pages pertinentes pour capter ce trafic déjà destiné à la marque.

IA invente /static/img/og-default.png (13× détecté, avec du trafic réel)
IA invente /static/logo-ailabsaudit.png (13× détecté, avec du trafic réel)
IA invente /blog/en/seo-vs-aeo-differences-complementarity (10× détecté, avec du trafic réel)
Insight derived 100% from YOUR real audit answers — no other tool has this data (see findings below).
High Priority Anti-hallucination Sentiment Quick fix High Impact
+1.4 pts · 1.0h
Map missing topics

From prompts where the brand is absent, identify uncovered topics and create a targeted editorial calendar.

Sur « Être cité par les IA (vocal) », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : indHack, Julien Gourdon, Media Dom
Sur « Vérifier référencement ChatGPT/Claude », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : AuditGEO, Panda SEO, LLM Pulse
Sur « Suivre la part de voix dans les IA », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas
High Priority AEO content Coverage Moderate High Impact
+2.4 pts · 2.0h
Standardize the company name across all pages

LLMs identify entities through cross-page textual consistency. Using more than 2 variants of the name (e.g. "AI Labs Audit", "AI Labs Audit SA", "AI Labs Audit Group") muddies entity resolution. Pick ONE canonical name and use it everywhere, with variants only in sameAs tags and legal mentions.

Medium Priority Brand entity GEO Optimization Quick fix Medium Impact
+1.1 pts · 1.0h
Add quotable blocks (callouts, definition lists, stat tables)

LLMs (AI Overviews, Perplexity, Claude) prioritize blockquotes, <dl> definition lists, data tables and callouts (class="callout", "tldr", "stat") for verbatim attributed citation. A page without any of these blocks is rarely quoted directly. Add 2-3 clear stat callouts + 1-2 structured definitions on your key pages.

Score : 0/100 — seuil 30
Détail : callouts: 0, blockquotes: 0, data tables: 0, ordered lists: 0, definition lists: 0
Princeton KDD 2024: citing sources and expert quotations increases AI visibility by +30-40%. source
Medium Priority GEO — study-proven GEO Optimization Moderate Medium Impact
+1.1 pts · 1.0h
Display the company registration number

Your company registration number is not visible. AI associates legal transparency with trustworthiness.

Sur « Être cité par les IA (vocal) », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : indHack, Julien Gourdon, Media Dom
Sur « Vérifier référencement ChatGPT/Claude », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : AuditGEO, Panda SEO, LLM Pulse
Sur « Suivre la part de voix dans les IA », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas
Low Priority Brand entity Presence Quick fix Low Impact
+0.6 pts · 30min
Analyze sources of better-cited competitors

Identify URLs and third-party sites cited as sources when AIs recommend your competitors. Aim for presence on these same platforms.

Semrush est cité 12 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Profound est cité 10 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Ahrefs est cité 9 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
High Priority External authority Share of Voice Moderate High Impact
+2.1 pts · 2.0h
Fill content gaps compared to competitors

Compare topics covered by competitors and missing from your site. Create targeted content on these subjects to reduce the visibility gap.

Semrush est cité 12 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Profound est cité 10 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Ahrefs est cité 9 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
High Priority AEO content Share of Voice Moderate High Impact
+2.1 pts · 2.0h
Fix what AIs say wrong about you

Il est nécessaire de corriger les informations inexactes que les IA pourraient diffuser sur AI Labs Audit. Une vérification d'identité permettra de comparer ce que les IA disent de l'entreprise avec les informations réelles et de corriger les affirmations inexactes.

Autorise les crawlers IA.
Insight derived 100% from YOUR real audit answers — no other tool has this data (see findings below).
High Priority Anti-hallucination Sentiment Quick fix High Impact
+1.4 pts · 1.5h
Strengthen the pages AIs actually cite

Quand les IA vous citent, elles citent /en/faq, /faq, /tutoriel/fr/audit-visibilite-ia — pas forcément les pages que vous croyez stratégiques. Renforcez et tenez à jour CES pages-là (fraîcheur, stats, réponses directes) : ce sont vos portes d'entrée réelles dans les réponses IA.

https://ailabsaudit.com/en/faq citée 18× par les IA
https://ailabsaudit.com/faq citée 14× par les IA
https://ailabsaudit.com/tutoriel/fr/audit-visibilite-ia citée 12× par les IA
Insight derived 100% from YOUR real audit answers — no other tool has this data (see findings below).
High Priority GEO — study-proven Position Quick fix High Impact
+1.4 pts · 2.0h
Be present on the sources AIs cite instead of you

L'audit a révélé des domaines où les IA s'appuient sur des sources qui ne mentionnent pas AI Labs Audit. Il est important d'obtenir des mentions, fiches ou articles sur ces sources pour améliorer la présence de la marque dans les réponses des IA.

Semrush est cité 12 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Profound est cité 10 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Ahrefs est cité 9 fois dans les réponses analysées (vous : 56 fois)
Insight derived 100% from YOUR real audit answers — no other tool has this data (see findings below).
High Priority External authority Share of Voice Moderate High Impact
+1.8 pts · 4.0h
Create or enrich the Wikipedia/Wikidata page

If the brand is notable enough, create a Wikipedia page with verifiable sources. Otherwise, enrich the Wikidata entry.

Wikipedia is ChatGPT's #1 cited source (7.8% of citations) and ~22% of large models' training data. source
High Priority External authority Lever for ChatGPT · Gemini Native Knowledge Project High Impact
+2.1 pts · 5.0h
Close the measured visibility gap between your languages

AI Labs Audit doit combler l'écart de visibilité mesuré entre ses langues. En créant de vraies pages locales pour les marchés où la visibilité est faible, la marque pourra mieux répondre aux requêtes locales.

Sur « Être cité par les IA (vocal) », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : indHack, Julien Gourdon, Media Dom
Sur « Vérifier référencement ChatGPT/Claude », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas — citées à la place : AuditGEO, Panda SEO, LLM Pulse
Sur « Suivre la part de voix dans les IA », 5 IA sur 5 ne vous mentionnent pas
Insight derived 100% from YOUR real audit answers — no other tool has this data (see findings below).
High Priority AEO content Coverage Moderate High Impact
+1.6 pts · 5.0h
Backlog (12)

Actions deprioritized by the GEO engine. Click to activate.

Standalone 40-50 word answer after each subheading
+6.0 pts · 1.5h · geo_optimization
Cover long-tail queries in the industry
+7.0 pts · 2.0h · coverage
Strengthen presence on review platforms
+6.0 pts · 2.0h · share_of_voice
Add descriptive alt-text to images
+3.0 pts · 1.0h · geo_optimization
Launch a targeted positive content strategy
+5.0 pts · 2.0h · sentiment
Fill in blind spots revealed by fan-out analysis
+5.0 pts · 3.0h · coverage
Identify and address sources of negative sentiment
+7.5 pts · 5.0h · sentiment
Fix contradictions detected across AI engines about your brand
+6.0 pts · 4.0h · sentiment
Publish and signal original data (studies, surveys, benchmarks)
+6.5 pts · 6.0h · native_knowledge
Verify and improve encyclopedic entries
+5.0 pts · 5.0h · sentiment
G2/Capterra/TrustRadius/Crunchbase presence
+5.5 pts · 8.0h · share_of_voice
Outreach to domains co-cited with your brand
+5.5 pts · 8.0h · share_of_voice